Publications

Publications

Peer-reviewed

2023 | ‘Blame it on the Algorithm? Russian Government-sponsored Media and Algorithmic Curation of Political Information on Facebook’ (with Makhortykh, M.) International Journal of Communication. 17(2023), 971-992.

2021 | ‘Kontrpropaganda Today: The roots of RT’s defensive practices and countering ethic,’ Journalism. Online First. Open access.

2020 | ‘Theorising Resilience: Russia’s Reaction to US and EU Sanctions’ (with Guter-Sandu, A.), East European Politics. 36:4, 603-621. Open access.

2018 | ‘Framing and Counter-framing in World Politics: The Case Study of Russian International Broadcasting, RT,’ PhD dissertation, City, University of London. 5 November 2018.

Working Papers

2023 | Temporally Stable Multilayer Network Embeddings: A Longitudinal Study of Russian Propaganda (with Matter, D., Vziatysheva, V., Vitulano, I., Pfeffer, J.) 17 July 2023.

2021 | ‘Blame it on the Algorithm? Russian Government-sponsored Media and Algorithmic Curation of Political Information on Facebook’ (with Makhortykh, M.), 62nd Annual Convention of the International Studies Association (ISA), Las Vegas. 8 April 2021.

2019 | ‘Normative Change and Democracy: Russia’s Digital Messages Find its Way into the International Public Sphere’, Winter School on ‘Digital Epistemics in International Relations’, Groningen, Lausanne, Oslo, Bruxelles, and Erfurt (GLOBE), Leysin (Switzerland).

Media Publications & Appearances

2022 | ‘Eine diverse Gemeinschaft: Mediennutzung russischsprachiger Menschen in Deutschland.’ Radio interview by Annika Schneider. Deutschlandfunk, 11 April 2022.

2022 | ‘Russen in Deutschland trauen vielen Medien nicht’. Der Freitag, 16 March 2022.

2022 | ‘Putin Shuts Down Russia’s Free Press for Reporting Accurately on Ukraine’. Nieman Reports, 9 March 2022.

2021 | ‘Alexei Navalny, Social Media, and the State of Free Press in Russia’. Nieman Reports. Harvard University, 10 June 2021.

2020 | ‘What to know about Russian Election Meddling.’ Media Interview by Higgins B. Elite Daily, 5 October 2020.

2018 | ‘RT and the Ideological Vacuum in Russia’. Diplomatic Magazine, 1 September 2018.

Awards

Robert H. Donaldson Award for the best paper written on the post-Communist region. ‘Russian Public Diplomacy Today: RT and Kontrpropaganda’. Paper presented on the 2019 Annual International Studies Association (ISA). Toronto. March 2019

Workshop organisation

2021 | From Cultural Security to Strategic Digital Communication in Russian Media Space’. Panel in Political Communication section at the 62nd Annual Convention of the International Studies Association (ISA) Las Vegas, 6-9 April 2021.

2020 | ‘Russian Public Diplomacy Today: RT and Kontrpropaganda’, Boston University, Center for the Study of Europe, Research Seminar, 22 May 2020.

‣
Writing database

Writing database

Hungry for more
March 5, 2021
Hungry for more
In many ways, the work of a critic is easy. We risk very little, yet enjoy a position over those who offer up their work and theirselves to our judgment. We thrive on negative criticism, which is fun to write and to read.
Why you should embrace remote research
March 17, 2020
Why you should embrace remote research
Qualitative research is typically conducted in-person, in a lab environment. But for many qualitative studies remote research can be just as good, if not better, at generating the insights needed to help a team move forward in their work.
The Creative Cycle
January 23, 2020
The Creative Cycle
I’ve noticed a pattern, it reveals itself through my mood and my energy, my self esteem and my ego, and my vigor or my listlessness. I refer to this pattern as the Creative Cycle.
The conversational tendencies to avoid in user interviews
August 15, 2019
The conversational tendencies to avoid in user interviews
Our natural social behaviours can hinder a deeper understanding of users. But what are these conversational tendencies and how can we avoid them to conduct better user interviews?
The product team’s missing function
January 12, 2019
The product team’s missing function
In a team of optimists trying to push things forward the researcher provides a necessary friction. Their indifference to the product keeps them questioning whether it needs to exist at all, long after the rest of the team have begun to believe their own stories.